Trending Topic

We bring you Articles, Poems, Stories, Inspirational Quotes and Speeches

Monday, September 2, 2013

Opening remarks by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay at a press conference during her mission to Sri Lanka - Colombo, 31 August 2013

Navanethem Pillay
Good morning, and thank you for coming.

As is customary at the end of official missions such as this, I would like to make some 
observations concerning the human rights situation in the country.

During my seven-day visit, I have held discussions with President Mahinda Rajapaksa, and 
senior members of the Government. These included the Ministers of External Affairs, Justice, 
Economic Development, National Languages and Social Integration, Youth Affairs and the 
Minister of Plantations Industries who is also Special Envoy to the President on Human 
Rights, as well as the Secretary of Defence. I also met the Chief Justice, Attorney-General, 
Leader of the House of Parliament and the Permanent Secretary to the President, who is 
head of the taskforce appointed to monitor the implementation of the report of the Lessons 
Learned and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC).


I had discussions with politicians who are not part of the current Government, namely the 
Leader of the Opposition and the leader of the Tamil National Alliance; in addition I met with
the National Human Rights Commission, and a total of eight different gatherings of human 
rights defenders and civil society organizations in Colombo, Jaffna and Trincomalee. I also 
received briefings from the Governors and other senior officials in the Northern and Eastern 
Provinces.

I thank the Government for its invitation and its excellent cooperation during the planning and 
conduct of this very complex mission. It stated that I could go anywhere, and see anything I 
wished to see. And, despite some disturbing incidents which I will go into later, that 
commitment was honoured throughout. 

Even though this is the longest official visit I have ever made to a single country, I am acutely 
conscious that I was unable to see everyone who requested a meeting. Nor will I be able to 
do justice to all the human rights issues facing the Sri Lankan people and government. Since I 
will be providing an oral update to the Human Rights Council in Geneva in late September, 
and a full written report in March next year, I will today confine myself to a few key issues that 
crystallized during the course of the mission.

I will divide these human rights issues into two parts: those related to the vicious and 
debilitating 27-year conflict between the Government and the LTTE, and its aftermath; and 
those that relate to the whole country.

Some media, ministers, bloggers and various propagandists in Sri Lanka have, for several 
years now, on the basis of my Indian Tamil heritage, described me as a tool of the LTTE. 
They have claimed I was in their pay, the “Tamil Tigress in the UN.” This is not only wildly 
incorrect, it is deeply offensive. This type of abuse has reached an extraordinary crescendo 
during this past week, with at least three Government Ministers joining in.
Firstly, let me say, I am a South African and proud of it.

Secondly, the LTTE was a murderous organization that committed numerous crimes and 
destroyed many lives. In fact, my only previous visit to Sri Lanka was to attend a 
commemoration of the celebrated legislator, peacemaker and scholar, Neelan Tiruchelvam, 
who was killed by an LTTE suicide bomb in July 1999. Those in the diaspora who continue to 
revere the memory of the LTTE must recognize that there should be no place for the 
glorification of such a ruthless organization.

I would like to pay my respects to all Sri Lankans, across the country, who were killed during 
those three decades of conflict, and offer my heartfelt sympathy to their families, all of whom 
– no matter who they are – share one thing: they have lost someone they can never replace. I 
have met many people during this visit whose relatives or spouses – both civilians and 
soldiers – are known to have been killed, or who are missing and may well be dead. 
It is important everyone realizes that, although the fighting is over, the suffering is not.
I have been extremely moved by the profound trauma I have seen among the relatives of the 
missing and the dead, and the war survivors, in all the places I have visited, as well as by 
their resilience. This was particularly evident among those scratching out a living among the 
ghosts of burned and shelled trees, ruined houses and other debris of the final battle of the 
the war along the lagoon in Mullaitivu.

Wounds will not heal and reconciliation will not happen, without respect for those who grieve, 
and remembrance for the tens of thousands of Tamils, Sinhalese, Muslims and others who 
died before their time on the battlefield, in buses, on the street, or in detention. As one wife of 
a missing man put it poignantly: “Even when we eat, we keep a portion for him.”
Throughout my visit, the authorities, at all levels, have been keen to demonstrate to me how 
much has been achieved in terms of resettlement, reconstruction and rehabilitation in the 
relatively short period since the conflict with the LTTE ended in 2009. And the reconstruction 
achievements, made with the help of donor countries, UN agencies and NGOs, are indeed 
impressive: in both the Eastern and Northern Provinces, large numbers of new roads, 
bridges, houses, medical facilities and schools have been built or rebuilt; electricity and water 
supplies have been greatly improved; and most of the landmines have been removed. As a 
result, the great majority of the more than 450,000 people who were internally displaced at
the end of the conflict have now gone home. 

These are important achievements, and I understand the Government’s concern that they 
have perhaps not been sufficiently recognized. However, physical reconstruction alone will 
not bring reconciliation, dignity, or lasting peace. Clearly, a more holistic approach is needed 
to provide truth, justice and reparations for people’s suffering during the war, and I have 
repeated my previous offer of OHCHR’s assistance in these areas.3
There are a number of specific factors impeding normalization, which – if not quickly rectified 
– may sow the seeds of future discord. These are by and large to do with the curtailment or 
denial of personal freedoms and human rights, or linked to persistent impunity and the failure 
of rule of law. 

From the very beginning, I have placed great hopes in Sri Lanka achieving true peace and 
reconciliation after the war. I welcomed the LLRC report as an important step in that direction, 
even though it side-stepped the much-needed full, transparent, impartial investigation into the 
conduct of a conflict that saw numerous war crimes and other violations committed by both 
sides. The Human Rights Council has expressed a strong interest in seeing progress in the 
implementation of the most important LLRC recommendations, and proper investigation of the 
many outstanding allegations and concerns. 

The LLRC report contains a broad range of excellent recommendations regarding concrete 
improvements on human rights, and I was interested to receive a briefing on the extent of the 
implementation of some of those recommendations from the Permanent Secretary to the 
President. My Office will closely examine that update and future developments in the 
implementation of the LLRC, and I will of course make reference to any genuine progress in 
my reports to the Human Rights Council.

I will now briefly outline some of the other issues that were raised during my visits to the Northern 
and Eastern Provinces, and which I have in turn raised with various ministers. 
I welcome the forthcoming elections to the Northern Provincial Council and hope they will 
proceed in a peaceful, free and fair environment, and usher in an important new stage in the 
devolution of power. 

I was concerned to hear about the degree to which the military appears to be putting down roots 
and becoming involved in what should be civilian activities, for instance education, agriculture 
and even tourism. I also heard complaints about the acquisition of private land to build military 
camps and installations, including a holiday resort. This is only going to make the complex land 
issues with which the Government has been grappling even more complicated and difficult to 
resolve. Clearly, the army needs some camps, but the prevalence and level of involvement of 
soldiers in the community seem much greater than is needed for strictly military or reconstruction 
purposes four years after the end of the war.

I understand the Secretary of Defence’s point that the demobilization of a significant proportion of
such a large army cannot be done overnight, but urge the government to speed up its efforts to 
demilitarize these two war-affected provinces, as the continued large-scale presence of the 
military and other security forces is seen by many as oppressive and intrusive, with the 
continuing high level of surveillance of former combatants and returnees at times verging on 
harassment. 

I was very concerned to hear about the vulnerability of women and girls, especially in femaleheaded households, to sexual harassment and abuse. I have raised this issue with several 
ministers, the provincial governors and senior military commanders who attended my meeting 
with the Secretary of Defence. I challenged them to rigorously enforce a zero tolerance policy for 
sexual abuse. 

I have also been following up on the status of the remaining detainees and have urged the 
Government to expedite their cases, either by bringing charges or releasing them for 
rehabilitation. I also suggested it may now be time to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act
which has long been cause for concern.

Because of the legacy of massive trauma, there is a desperate need for counseling and 
psychosocial support in the North, and I was surprised and disappointed to learn that the 
authorities have restricted NGO activity in this sector. I hope the Government can relax controls 
on this type of assistance.

I met many relatives of missing or disappeared civilians and soldiers who are still hoping to 
discover the whereabouts of their loved ones, and they emphasized the urgent need to resolve 
this issue – something that was made abundantly evident at the two very moving meetings with 
relatives of the disappeared that I attended yesterday, to commemorate the International Day of 
the Victims of Forced Disappearances. 

I asked the Government for more information about the new Commission of Inquiry on 
Disappearances, and stressed the need for it to be more effective than the five previous 
commissions of this kind. I was disappointed to learn that it will only cover disappearances in the 
Northern and Eastern Provinces, which means that the many “white van” disappearances 
reported in Colombo and other parts of the country in recent years will not fall within its scope.
I urge the Government to broaden the Commission’s mandate, and seize this opportunity to 
make a comprehensive effort to resolve the disappearances issue once and for all. I therefore 
welcome the new proposal to criminalize disappearances in the penal code, and hope this will be 
done without delay. The Government could also send a clear signal of its commitment by 
ratifying the International Convention on Disappearances, and by inviting the Working Group on
Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances to visit Sri Lanka, ideally before I report back to the 
Human Rights Council in March. 

The Human Rights Council will also be looking to see something credible in terms of 
investigation of what happened at the end of the war and many other past cases. 
I was pleased to learn that the case of the five students murdered on the beach in Trincomalee in 
2006 has been reinvigorated by the arrest of 12 Police Special Task Force members known to 
have been in the vicinity at the time of the killings. I will be watching the progress of that case 
with interest, as well as the other infamous unsolved case of 17 ACF aid workers murdered in 
the same year, just a few kilometres to the south.

I also requested more information about the Courts of Inquiry appointed by the army to further 
investigate the allegations of civilian casualties and summary executions, and suggested that 
appointing the army to investigate itself does not inspire confidence in a country where so many 
past investigations and commissions of inquiry have foundered one way or another. Unless there 
is a credible national process, calls for an international inquiry are likely to continue.
The recent deployment of the military in support of police to control a demonstration in 
Welawariya, which resulted in at least three deaths, has sent a shockwave through the 
community. I stressed to the Defence Secretary the need to urgently complete and publish a 5
proper investigation into this incident.

Too many other investigation files remain pending, for instance the custodial deaths of
prisoners in Vavuniya and Welikada Prisons in 2012. The Government has since announced 
police powers will now be transferred from the Ministry of Defence to a new Ministry of Law 
and Order, but this is at best a partial separation as both Ministries will remain under the 
President, rather than under a separate civilian ministry.

I have also reminded the Government that Sri Lanka desperately needs strong witness and 
victim protection legislation, which has been languishing in draft form since 2007.

I expressed concern at the recent surge in incitement of hatred and violence against religious 
minorities, including attacks on churches and mosques, and the lack of swift action against the 
perpetrators. I was surprised that the Government seemed to downplay this issue, and I hope it
will send the strongest possible signal of zero tolerance for such acts and ensure that those 
responsible (who are easily identifiable on video footage) are punished. The Minister of National 
Languages and Social Integration told me that he has proposed new legislation on hate speech. 
We have recently concluded a study of such laws and would be happy to assist in this area. The 
same Minister, along with the Minister of Justice, expressed to me his support for a visit by the 
Independent Expert on Minorities, and I hope this can happen as soon as possible. I also 
applaud the Government’s policy of introducing tri-lingualism all across the country.

I would now like to turn to a disturbing aspect of the visit, namely the harassment and 
intimidation of a number of human rights defenders, at least two priests, journalists, and many
ordinary citizens who met with me, or planned to meet with me. I have received reports that 
people in villages and settlements in the Mullaitivu area were visited by police or military officers 
both before and after I arrived there. In Trincomalee, several people I met were subsequently 
questioned about the content of our conversation. 

This type of surveillance and harassment appears to be getting worse in Sri Lanka, which is a 
country where critical voices are quite often attacked or even permanently silenced. Utterly 
unacceptable at any time, it is particularly extraordinary for such treatment to be meted out 
during a visit by a UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. I wish to stress that the United 
Nations takes the issue of reprisals against people because they have talked to UN officials as 
an extremely serious matter, and I will be reporting those that take place in connection with this 
visit to the Human Rights Council. 

I urge the Government of Sri Lanka to issue immediate orders to halt this treatment of human 
rights defenders and journalists who face this kind of harassment and intimidation on a regular 
basis. More than 30 journalists are believed to have been killed since 2005, and several more –
including the cartoonist Prageeth Ekneligoda – have disappeared. Many others have fled the 
country. Newspaper and TV offices have been vandalized or subjected to arson attacks – some, 
such as the Jaffna-based paper Uthayan, on multiple occasions. With self-censorship fuelled by 
fear, journalists report that there are articles that they dare not write, and others their editors dare 
not print. Freedom of expression is under a sustained assault in Sri Lanka. I have called for the 
right to Information Act to be adopted like many of its neighbours in SAARC.

The war may have ended, but in the meantime democracy has been undermined and the rule 
of law eroded. The 18th amendment, which abolished the Constitutional Council which once 6
recommended appointments to the independent bodies, such as the Elections Commission 
and Human Rights Commission, has weakened these important checks and balances on the 
power of the Executive. The controversial impeachment of the Chief Justice earlier this year, 
and apparent politicization of senior judicial appointments, have shaken confidence in the 
independence of the judiciary. 

I am deeply concerned that Sri Lanka, despite the opportunity provided by the end of the war 
to construct a new vibrant, all-embracing state, is showing signs of heading in an increasingly 
authoritarian direction. 

Ending on a more optimistic note, yesterday, at the Government’s suggestion, I 
visited the Youth Parliament. This unusual institution, founded in 2010, is filled with bright, 
enthusiastic students from all across the country, and dedicated to a tolerant and all-inclusive 
approach. The parliament draws on elected members of youth groups who meet once a 
month to discuss key issues such as the importance of Amendment 13 to the Constitution and 
the LLRC (indeed they claim they actually debated the latter before the National Parliament). 

I hope that the current and future members of the Youth Parliament, three of whom delivered 
excellent speeches in my presence, will, when they graduate to the main political stage, usher 
in a new era of tolerant coexistence in this beautiful island, where – despite the problems I 
have listed above – I have been greeted with great warmth and hospitality.

Thank you.

No comments: